The Killing of Kate Carroll
Introduction from
Chronology
Kate Carroll, a 36-year-old Catholic woman, who lived near Duffy’s
Cross, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan is taken from her house
by the IRA and shot dead. A sign saying spies
and informers beware is attached to her body.
More Detail
In his book published in 2000, Dooley says that “In April 1921, a
middle-aged Protestant spinster, Kate Carroll … was taken from her home near
Castleblaney by a gang of men and murdered”.
However, in Dooley (2017a) he states that while “contemporary papers
stated that Carroll was a Protestant … she was in fact a Roman Catholic who had
come to the IRA’s attention for illegal distilling [i.e.
running a poitín still]”. Dooley notes that her execution was against
an IRA general order which prohibited the killing of female spies – see
Nov-09-20/6.
In a
highly detailed analysis of the killing of Kate Carrol (available online here), Meehan disputes claims made by a number of historians around the
reasons Kate Carroll was killed. Meehan
points out that Dooley claimed that Kate Carroll was a Protestant in a number
of articles (and that her killing was sectarian) before correctly noting that
she was a Roman Catholic in later work (see above). Meehan also examines evidence, put forward by
a number of historians, that Carroll was shot by the IRA because she ran a poitín still and finds the evidence wanting. In addition, he examines a number of other
reasons put forward for her killing (such as that she was a social deviant,
that she was pestering a local IRA man to marry him, that she was informing on
other poitín makers, that she was of ‘feeble
intellect’, etc.) and again finds the evidence wanting.
He then
goes on to examine evidence from a number of men involved in the IRA in
Monaghan and concludes that there was considerable IRA testimony available “to
the effect that Kate Carroll had informed against the IRA” and had been warned
to desist. In particular, Meehan refers to
the testimony of Thomas Brennan who was an IRA intelligence officer. He quotes Brennan as saying that Carrol had
written to the RIC giving the location of an IRA arms and the places where IRA
men were staying at night. Brennan went on
to say that “This person Kate Carroll wrote letters again and again to R.I.C. Scotstown wanting to know why these fellows were not
arrested and their arms seized.” Meehan concludes
“The evidence, properly scrutinised, shows that Kate Carroll is no longer a
Protestant, feeble minded, spurned by a volunteer who dishonoured her, or a
snit on fellow moonshine makers. She is
someone … who became an informer, and who ignored warnings to desist. That does
not mean that she should have been executed.
But it is the reason that she was executed.”
However,
as noted by Dooley above, the IRA’s GHQ had issued a General Order on the
handling of Women Spies – see Nov-09-20/6. Meehan mentions this Order and says that the
killing of Carroll “appears to be a violation of IRA ‘General Order No. 13’ in
which ‘Women Spies’ should be warned and (if not Irish) deported”. However, according to Hughes, General Order
No. 13 also states that “In ‘dangerous and insistent’ cases, commanders were
ordered to seek instructions from GHQ” (Hughes (2016), pg
136). Meehan does not mention if any local commanders (in particular, O/C of the
Monaghan Brigade of the IRA, Eoin O’Duffy) sought
instructions from IRA GHQ in the Kate Carroll case. If the local commanders did not seek instructions
from GHQ in the Kate Carroll case then the Monaghan IRA
were not acting as a disciplined armed force but taking decisions into their own
hands which were outside their authority.
The reason for the special treatment of ‘Women Spies’ was the position
which women held in Irish society at this time and the bad publicity which
would result from the execution of women who were alleged to be informers or
spies. As O’Halpin
(2012) notes, along with the other two women killed by the IRA as informers during
the War of Independence (Bridget Noble – see Mar-04-21/3 – and Mary Lindsay –
see cMar-21-21/4) “These killings caused acute embarrassment locally and at
GHQ.”